|
Post by peetee on Oct 18, 2016 17:22:06 GMT
Highest Away Scores Premier League...Mark Trafford 14580 @ Glad's B League One...Alan Lowe 9130 @ Glad's B League Two...Lewis Stratford 7650 & HCC
Highest Away Breaks Premier League...Mark Trafford 10310 @ Vikings. League One...Ian Moquet 8190 @ Democrats League Two...Keith Hollis 6970 @ Democrats
Most Wins Premier League.M Trafford 16/17 congratulations Mark. League One.. A Lowe 15/20 I Moquet 15/20. trophies will be awarded to both players.Congratulations League Two...B Pincombe 12/19 Well done Bob.
|
|
|
Post by Ian Gordon on Oct 27, 2016 21:49:09 GMT
I thought Gladiators were in section 2 which means that the highest away score and break can't be gained on their table?
|
|
delboy
Full Forum Member
Posts: 396
|
Post by delboy on Oct 28, 2016 9:39:29 GMT
I think your right Premier players can't claim break or scores against sides from section 2
|
|
|
Post by Ian Gordon on Oct 28, 2016 10:16:44 GMT
Well that was the rule last season Alan and I don't think it was changed at the AGM this year unless Pete tells us different? :thumbup:
|
|
|
Post by peetee on Oct 31, 2016 17:21:52 GMT
I have checked my notes (Dec 2013) and states Premier and Sect 1 players could not claim against Sect 2 teams. But I'm unable to find it in the minutes. I have updated.(Might have to update again).... Cheers Pete
|
|
|
Post by milhouse on Nov 2, 2016 9:34:45 GMT
It is true Pete, we have the same conversation at the start of each year :)
|
|
delboy
Full Forum Member
Posts: 396
|
Post by delboy on Nov 2, 2016 13:29:32 GMT
You are both wrong it was for Premier only however it should be changed there are so few tables it should stand for every player to be able to claim breaks or scores . Highest away score was awarded last season to a player getting highest from section 1 on a table from section 2 . Call a meeting to sort this out
|
|
|
Post by milhouse on Nov 18, 2016 18:57:25 GMT
Looking at what has been added above, does this mean Premier players can now get highest scores/breaks against Div2 players?
|
|
|
Post by Ian Gordon on Nov 18, 2016 22:08:46 GMT
Looking at what has been added above, does this mean Premier players can now get highest scores/breaks against Div2 players? This is wrong if it is the case. Nothing can undo this rule apart from an AGM or EGM.
|
|
|
Post by alan on Nov 19, 2016 17:46:42 GMT
Looking at what has been added above, does this mean Premier players can now get highest scores/breaks against Div2 players? This is wrong if it is the case. Nothing can undo this rule apart from an AGM or EGM. This was not an AGM rule but a rule created by the Committee a few years ago. The Committee have now voted to do away with the rule so no EGM required.
|
|
|
Post by milhouse on Nov 19, 2016 23:41:24 GMT
Really? I thought it was an AGM decision?
Could be an interesting night on Thursday playing against Vikings B then if there is a potential prize available for a big break or score ........
|
|
|
Post by Ian Gordon on Nov 20, 2016 9:57:53 GMT
Don't worry milhouse there's no chance of getting any big breaks on the vikings table :rolleyes: :rolleyes:! This is no way to keep new players and the section 2 teams going as they are going to get fed up with that!
|
|
delboy
Full Forum Member
Posts: 396
|
Post by delboy on Nov 20, 2016 13:55:46 GMT
Most of Prem & section 1 players would show respect to the section 2 players
|
|
sham
Junior Forum Member
Posts: 32
|
Post by sham on Nov 20, 2016 14:23:48 GMT
Do you really think so? I believe that players of a higher calibre than section 2 players will see this as an opportunity to play tables out or just build big scores to stake their claim on another trophy. I'm afraid that if this "rule" stands there will be a number of us (me included) who will not continue playing.
|
|
delboy
Full Forum Member
Posts: 396
|
Post by delboy on Nov 20, 2016 14:46:18 GMT
I believe that there are only a few that won't show respect
|
|
foggie
Full Forum Member
Posts: 101
|
Post by foggie on Nov 20, 2016 14:57:48 GMT
Just for the record I voted against this because I think Prem/Sec 1 players will take advantage against Sec 2 players as I explained to Pete Ewins last week when this 1st talked about Very unhappy Sec 2 Player (me)
|
|
sham
Junior Forum Member
Posts: 32
|
Post by sham on Nov 20, 2016 15:14:50 GMT
I believe that there are only a few that won't show respect A "few" is too many and if they do all show respect then what was the point of changing the rule in the first place!
|
|
|
Post by alan on Nov 20, 2016 19:30:14 GMT
Really? I thought it was an AGM decision? Could be an interesting night on Thursday playing against Vikings B then if there is a potential prize available for a big break or score ........ It was a committee decision Mark. There has never been an AGM proposal for this. We just thought it would be a good idea at the time but with only 8 tables to play on now, and many not good enough to be played out (unless your name is Mark Trafford), we have voted to lift the rule. As you know, there is always a prize for highest away break and score and you'll have 2 chances at the Vikings now.
|
|
|
Post by alan on Nov 20, 2016 19:36:17 GMT
Just for the record I voted against this because I think Prem/Sec 1 players will take advantage against Sec 2 players as I explained to Pete Ewins last week when this 1st talked about Very unhappy Sec 2 Player (me) All players try to win games for their team and most are not trying to get highest breaks or scores unless there is nothing to lose at the end of the season. I don't think lifting this rule with have any real effect but let's see, and if it does, someone can put a proposal forward at the next AGM.
|
|
|
Post by BigPhilMac on Nov 21, 2016 12:09:56 GMT
I believe that there are only a few that won't show respect A "few" is too many and if they do all show respect then what was the point of changing the rule in the first place! Graham at what point have you decided that respect is still being shown or not? What factors have you used to determine this? The thing is there is no objective standard when it comes to what is or isn't disrespect. Your idea of a player being disrespectful could be totally different to mine. And to be quite honest, I can't really think of anyone in our league who would take the mickey in a game against a lower section player. There's only a couple who would have the ability to go mad on any of the tables but what would be the point?
|
|
sham
Junior Forum Member
Posts: 32
|
Post by sham on Nov 21, 2016 14:38:33 GMT
Phil
It was not myself that mentioned "respect" in the first place - I was merely replying to the comment by Alan Lowe, and I agree with you that it is impossible to define where respect begins and ends and where taking the proverbial starts.
My point is that if Premier section players are allowed to go for high scores or breaks on Section 2 tables then there is the possibility (probability?) of there being a number of the less capable Section 2 players who will soon get fed up standing watching those players rack up high numbers without possibly even playing a shot. Let's be honest, if you (or anyone for that matter) had the opportunity to take the prize by scoring heavily on a Section 2 table then I am sure that person would do so without even thinking of respect!
We will have to see what happens now in the remainder of the season.
Graham
|
|
sandra
Full Forum Member
Posts: 65
|
Post by sandra on Nov 21, 2016 16:41:50 GMT
I have to say I agree with Graham. I have been in the position of standing watching a premier player rack up high numbers without even getting a go on the table (or maybe one!). You are then in a position of having to pay for the game, (without having a go on the table yourself) then you have to buy the player a drink and then pay for their food. A great evening had by all!
|
|
sham
Junior Forum Member
Posts: 32
|
Post by sham on Nov 21, 2016 17:31:47 GMT
I have to say I agree with Graham. I have been in the position of standing watching a premier player rack up high numbers without even getting a go on the table (or maybe one!). You are then in a position of having to pay for the game, (without having a go on the table yourself) then you have to buy the player a drink and then pay for their food. A great evening had by all!
|
|
sham
Junior Forum Member
Posts: 32
|
Post by sham on Nov 21, 2016 17:32:32 GMT
Thanks for the support Sandra - glad I'm not the only one!!
Graham
|
|
beefy
Distinguished Member
T
Posts: 753
|
Post by beefy on Nov 21, 2016 18:05:55 GMT
How can you change it, several Prem teams / sect one team will have played at sect 2 tables and tapped up, according to alan, how is changing it mid season fair to those players. I think you should leave it for this year and if someone wants it back propose it !
|
|
beefy
Distinguished Member
T
Posts: 753
|
Post by beefy on Jan 13, 2017 12:10:48 GMT
Pete, please clarify this rule as i heard a different understanding last night from your team members, did this come back in or not ?
|
|
|
Post by peetee on Jan 16, 2017 17:00:31 GMT
Pete, please clarify this rule as i heard a different understanding last night from your team members, did this come back in or not ? Players from Premier and League 1 will be able to claim highest away break and score on League 2 tables. Agreed at committee meeting.
|
|
|
Post by peetee on Apr 23, 2017 8:36:02 GMT
Most wins updated 23rd April Please let me know if different. Cheers Pete
|
|
|
Post by peetee on May 8, 2017 17:01:51 GMT
Final update I hope.. Cheers Pete
|
|