|
|
Post by Chris_Sav on Nov 10, 2019 11:24:09 GMT
Proposed
This appears incomplete as no sanction is mentioned
[edit] sorry note this is an addition to rule 100 on loss of total score[/edit]
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris_Sav on Nov 10, 2019 11:29:25 GMT
The rule is too narrow in any case as other actions could be taken to prevent the black peg penalty such as knocking over the white skittle.
'Deliberately causing a loss of break penalty to precede a possible loss of total score penalty will result in a loss of total score penalty'
Would make more sense
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2019 11:33:21 GMT
It would live as clause c) in current rule 100. I marked that at the top and did not feel the need to add all of the previously agreed text.
If you want to amend the wording feel free but it must be agreed by the proposer and seconder.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris_Sav on Nov 10, 2019 11:36:01 GMT
Yes just spotted that Lorin.
If the proposer and seconder want to broaden their rule proposition then that is the best way, alternatively it can be proposed as an amendment to a proposition at the AGM.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2019 11:39:51 GMT
Stephen is happy with whatever you decide so over to you Joe
|
|
|
|
Post by joefoxon on Nov 10, 2019 13:19:38 GMT
I'm happy to compromise on wording, we can discuss at the AGM and work on something we're all happy with.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris_Sav on Nov 11, 2019 10:40:48 GMT
My suggested amendment does not seem to have provoked any interest or a seconder so I'll withdraw it and leave the original proposition to stand.
|
|
|
|
Post by joefoxon on Nov 11, 2019 10:58:10 GMT
My suggested amendment does not seem to have provoked any interest or a seconder so I'll withdraw it and leave the original proposition to stand. Whoops, I didn't spot the amendment before, I'm willing to second this. |
|
|
|
Post by Chris_Sav on Nov 11, 2019 15:04:18 GMT
Cheers Joe,
Stephen has already said he will second either version so may I suggest you alter your proposal, if desired, before this evening is out.
|
|
|
|
Post by joefoxon on Nov 12, 2019 10:46:14 GMT
I'm happy for both versions to be discussed, so that we can come up with a rule that everyone's happy with.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2019 11:16:10 GMT
I'm happy for both versions to be discussed, so that we can come up with a rule that everyone's happy with. Please submit the wording you’d like (both versions) to be included in the AGM documentation which is being issued to county secretaries this week. Please use the form on the website. Thanks, Lorin |
|
