Week 8 12/11/2015

[bigtj]

Week 8 12/11/15
Albion B	3	2	Smugglers A
Duke of Wellington	3	2	Tarring Club
Henty	3	2	Marine View
Romans	4	1	White Hart B
Smugglers B	4	1	Swan A
Swan Nomads	2	3	Southdown
White Hart A	1	4	Albion A

[oaklj007]

Sawn Nomads 2 vs 3 Southdown

N.Brown 8510 vs 3160 P.Oakley*
*P.Barnet 2790 vs 8930 B.Holt
N.Higgins 0800 vs 6730 C.Oakley*
*T.Burgges 2900 vs 8510 B.Hall
G.Riddly 7570 vs 3990 J.Oakley*

Good game and grate company cheers for the game!!!
sadly i still cant win a game even when i get loads of chances every week but Garry played well and punished me
Chris still up to form but still needed 2 goes to kill it off
Barry got 1 chance and killed it off
also well done bob for winning 2 times against the brake at the sawn getting another big score
got nothing to say about dad he was awful least i know where i get it from ;)

[edit by Sav] Profanity removed - do not use four letter words please

[gandalf the untidy]

Smugglers B 4 v 1 Swan A

Colin Southouse 2520 v 8340 Roger Taylor**
Bob Osborne** 6120 v 980 Vernon Blake
Phil OSborne 4030 v 2020 Brian Richards**
Dave White** 3990 v 3020 Terry Denyer
Ros Appleby 4130 v 1940 Christine Richards**

[BB Warrior]

<p></p>

Home	Team	Duke of Wellington	v	Tarring Club	Away	Team
Legs	Score	Player	v	Player	Score	Legs
1	6,820	Mathew Knight *	v	Alex Heaseman	1,470	0
1	2,640	Dave Ingram	v	Michael Formoy *	2,060	0
0	2,270	Jean Brackenridge	v	Dave Collins *	3,480	1
1	12,310	Nigel Senior *	v	Tony Collins	1,080	0
0	1,810	Chris Tupper	v	Matt Jones *	4,540	1
3	25,850	Totals	v	Totals	12,630	2

A first home victory of the season for the Duke which sees us move off the bottom of the premier division table.

Plenty of chances in all of the games and enjoyable evening in good company.

Apologies to our visitors for the lack of food....

[bigtj]

Albion B	12/11		Smugglers A
Rick Cunningham *	2850	3130	Chris Lucas
Terry Molloy	7550	5150	Steve Hurley *
Steve Aylmore	9670	1160	Dave Jones *
Tony Jenner *	6800	1370	Andy Farmer-Wright
Pete Hickman	180	12070	Colin Green *
3	27050	22880	2	49930

Rick lost just under 7k opener and then all got a bit scrappy with Chris on the table at the right time as the bar dropped.

Steve off early, Terry built 5k lead, Steve having good chase but broke down as bar due when on course to take it.

Dave off early and Steve played a good steady game.

TJ off 2k, Andy lost 2k, and then all very nervy but TJ battled for the win.

Colin opened with 11570 break all over.

A good night where result could have gone either way, curry to finish.

[BB Warrior]

I heard that Albion A beat the White Hart A 4-1 last night....

[neilh]

Have you got the breaks the right way around there Dave? Tarring Club should have had breaks 1,3 and 5.

[BB Warrior]

Nov 13, 2015 10:00:55 GMT neilh said:

Have you got the breaks the right way around there Dave? Tarring Club should have had breaks 1,3 and 5.

Hello Neil, that is also what I thought before the game started.... but Nigel and Matthew both said that the home team should have breaks 1 and 4 so that is what we played.

[neilh]

Well you and I are correct Dave. Home team have breaks 1 and 4 only when teams from the same Division play each other. That Nigel and Silent, what do they know? ;)

[Ros]

I hate to say I told you so (smug b*tch here)

I said at the AGM that having the breaks in different orders would lead to confusion.

I think we played it wrong last night then - we had breaks 1 and 4. Nobody from Swan A argued with that.

[neilh]

Having potentially opened a can of worms, I've just been reading the current rules L.4 and L.5 which govern the order of player nomination and subsequent break order. Hardly surprising then that confusion is arising as not only are there 3 protocols for break order, but there are also 3 for which Captain should nominate their player first!

It came as a surprise to me, reading L.4, that where teams of the same division play each other, whilst it is only implied that the Home team has breaks 1 and 4 (it doesn't actually say it), it does state that the Home team nominates first in games 1 and 4 and the Away team in games 2,3 and 5. We haven't been doing that, even when playing against the League Secretary's team (shows he doesn't know the rules either).

I wonder how many matches this season have been played where Captains, and I include myself in this, are ignorant of the rules.

[littletd]

Nov 13, 2015 13:15:41 GMT Ros said:

I hate to say I told you so (smug b*tch here)

I said at the AGM that having the breaks in different orders would lead to confusion.

I think we played it wrong last night then - we had breaks 1 and 4. Nobody from Swan A argued with that.

Sorry Ros - Swan had breaks 1,3 and 5 [Roger broke in the first] argument not required.

[dipper]

Yes Swan `A` had 1-3 and 5 breaks.

[bigtj]

It has been pointed out to Dave he has worded the part about captain with break names wrong and I believe amendment will show on the black peg!!!

[Ros]

Nov 13, 2015 17:31:02 GMT littletd said:

Nov 13, 2015 13:15:41 GMT Ros said:

I hate to say I told you so (smug b*tch here)

I said at the AGM that having the breaks in different orders would lead to confusion.

I think we played it wrong last night then - we had breaks 1 and 4. Nobody from Swan A argued with that.

Sorry Ros - Swan had breaks 1,3 and 5 [Roger broke in the first] argument not required.

Yes, sorry, you are right Terry. I was forgetting that Roger had the opening break.

However, even though we got it right on the night, having different orders of breaks depending on the opponents is bound to lead to errors. If the wording on who chooses first is wrong in the rules, then we have a chaotic situation to deal with!

[bigtj]

Romans v White Hart B anyone know the result???

[rosspettiford]

Hi TJ,

Sorry for no update Romans 4-1 White Hart B

Thank you.