|
Post by craig mace on Sept 1, 2012 19:41:55 GMT
Isnt berinsfield b a sorry sight there at the bottom :( :p You go up next year :P
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Aug 27, 2012 20:06:22 GMT
Thinking about it (which is unusual for me) the Oxford League committee likes all teams (where possible) to play on the first week of the new season, so it must be that Berinsfield will definitely play in the next round and one of the other six winners will have a bye through to the Semi Finals. Hope this makes sense to all! ::) problem is should this happen (which is unlikely) you cant just swap the draw around to suit because that not fair on the team who get the bye twice i know it seems unfair on other teams but its just luck of the draw :P
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Aug 27, 2012 15:33:32 GMT
yes phil we would go into the plate seeing as we haven't played a 1st round game the second round would class as our 1st round game if you follow
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Aug 22, 2012 19:36:58 GMT
My team will be
C.Mace C.Bateman P.Soanes B.Pincombe G.Mace A.Ingram D.Jarman (reserve)
had to take dad from my team as only have 5 teams in the section
All players have been contacted and are good to go
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Aug 16, 2012 22:35:05 GMT
Berinsfield 5 - 1 Marlborough
J.Boal 4,360 V 870 P.Rose G.Mace 3,720 V 2,750 C.Bateman C.Mace 11,340 V 2,450 A.McIntyre John 140 V 7140 Pete Geoff 3280 V 2370 Chris Craig 4070 V 2020 Arthur
By my calculations we win league???
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Aug 14, 2012 15:50:33 GMT
Hi all theres been a lot of umming and arring over the fate of the labour clubs team and table but nothing concrete, has anyone got a clue about whats occurring with it? Phil mc I thought they where moving over the road to the staff club
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Aug 2, 2012 22:42:59 GMT
Berinsfield A v Berinsfield B
J.Boal 5250 v 740 A.Ingram C.Mace 5110 v 4700 P.McFarland G.Mace 11,380 v 260 C.Plant John 2900 v 4210 Adam Craig 10,720 v 480 Phil Geoff 14,620 v B/P Chris
Berinsfield A 5 - 1 Berinsfield B
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Aug 1, 2012 5:36:21 GMT
Gladiators 3 v Berinsfield 3 No card. you got to blame the chairman for that :P
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Jul 25, 2012 16:33:13 GMT
Can you add Geoffrey mace Craig mace Phil McFarland Adam Ingram to the draw please
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Jul 9, 2012 22:52:19 GMT
Would have been Craig...but no result card.. :-*[/quote]
I put it in the post last Friday hmm must of got lost ill right another 1 out and personally deliver it
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Jul 5, 2012 22:45:20 GMT
Berinsfield A V Bletchington
J.Boal 2640 V 1600 A.Skinner C.Mace 5960 v 1010 S.Brookbank G.Mace 4600 v 4080 G.Powell John 3120 v 910 Andy Craig 11,510 v 580 shawn Geoff M 8,600 v 2160 Geoff P
Berinsfield A 6 - 0 Bletchington
Headliners pete?? :P ::)
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Jun 30, 2012 21:04:00 GMT
So Dennis played 3 times? Is this a new rule? Probably meant to be Dave
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Jun 21, 2012 22:23:51 GMT
Marlborough 6-0 berinsfield b chris iagoe 4400 v 530 chris plant (including a black peg) Arthur mcintyre 6050 v phil mcfarland 1400 (could of gone the other way had i kept my break) Iain major 3390 v 1510 adam ingram (not a bad effort by the newbie) Chris i 3860 v 220 chris p (3 blacks for mr plant, jolly good show) Arthur 3960 v 3720 yours truly (cracking game here with arthur winning deservedly despite me taking the lead at the end) Banger 2560 v 1400 adam (another decent performance by the young lad and by no means disgracing himself on the night) A brilliant night enjoyed by all with planty achieving his promised 4 blacks Congratulations Adam on Achieving 2 scores over 1000 in one night brilliant performance
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Jun 21, 2012 22:21:28 GMT
Berinsfield A VS Gladiators
C.Mace 5550 V 1040 M.Lee G.Mace 8290 V 730 D.Jarman J.Boal 3530 V 1420 B.Pincombe C.Mace 8580 V 2210 M.Lee G.Mace 9780 V 280 D.Jarman J.Boal 2920 V 4070 B.Pincombe
Berinsfield A 5 VS 1 Gladiators
John lost a winning break of 1760 in the last couple of mins Bob got break back to steal a point Me and dad where playing what you can do i can do better as you can see he got lucky :-X :'( :P sorry Bob and Malcolm hehe :P [b]Brilliant night very friendly atmosphere [/b] will post card tomorrow morning Pete[/left]
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Jun 13, 2012 19:33:39 GMT
Got to be Germany all the way just pure class
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Jun 4, 2012 12:59:08 GMT
any chance of some sections soon?
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Jun 3, 2012 9:41:51 GMT
The entry form a chq has been put in the post today for Craig mace and Phil McFarland
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on May 9, 2012 17:33:21 GMT
Berinsfield A
C.Mace G.Mace J.Boal
Berinsfield B
P.McFarland C.Plant A.Ingram
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Apr 30, 2012 18:05:44 GMT
Berinsfield v Marlborough
T.Broadway 1770 V 760 P.Rose G.Mace 8160 V 1890 C.Iagoe J.Boal 1310 V 1540 I.Major C.Mace 2010 V 3290 C.Bateman A.Ingram 480 V A.Mcintire 5160
Berinsfield 2 Marlborough 3
BREAKING NEWS: PHIL MCFARLAND NEVER HAD ANYTHING TO EAT AFTER THE GAME :o :o :o :o
Sooo sorry about your loss pete sending all love your way
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Apr 23, 2012 16:28:02 GMT
This is the only competition where the earlier rounds give advantage to the home teams. Surely at the Semi-final stage it's fairer to play on neutral tables? I propose we leave it as it is. What about changing the KO Cup to be played the same way as the Scotland Ash? This would free up some Thursdays for competitions. I think the SAC should be played on neutral tables all the way through. Also, i don't know what others think, but i don't see a need for 2 team cup competitions. If we got rid of the Team KO, this would free up 5/6 weeks in order to play more competitions on a Thursday. I will second this if its a proposal by mark
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Apr 22, 2012 17:31:02 GMT
Proposed by Dave Gordon The Scotland Ash Cup/Plate semi final to be played as the same way as earlier rounds.i,e. Drawn Home or Away and not on neutral tables. Seconder required.. This is the only competition where the earlier rounds give advantage to the home teams. Surely at the Semi-final stage it's fairer to play on neutral tables? I propose we leave it as it is. What about changing the KO Cup to be played the same way as the Scotland Ash? This would free up some Thursdays for competitions. a I agree with Alan the quarter and semi finals of any competition should be neutral tables to give a fair game all round
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Apr 15, 2012 15:34:29 GMT
Does anyone know if the Horse & Harrow Pub in West Hagbourne still has a Bar Billiards table? We were there last year (and in 2006) and have played the Pool table there and the Crazy Golf course in the beer garden. If they still have a table there I'll pay the pub another visit later in the summer. Thanks. If this is the one just on the other side of didcot which i think it is then yes it does still have a bar billiards table
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Apr 8, 2012 19:04:21 GMT
Craig Mace and Phil McFarland please
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Apr 8, 2012 0:03:07 GMT
I hope phil makes a speedy recovery and is back winning games of billiards on behalf of berinsfield we wish you all the best dick and phil and the rest of the glads get well soon phil!
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Apr 6, 2012 11:40:37 GMT
Id like to propose a relegation/promotion system for the leagues. I understand that the same teams may not enter next year but i think its worth looking at. Do you mean no matter who wins the league and who looses you go up or down no matter the strength of the team? if not then we already have this system lol
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Apr 6, 2012 9:43:34 GMT
I would like to propose that the Association withdraw the Premier and Sect 1 Individuals next season. I will second this
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Apr 5, 2012 16:13:27 GMT
Let me jump in here to settle something to save this dragging on! You cannot have more than 2 teams per table, this cannot be changed. What can happen, if you have 2 teams at a venue with 5 players each, you could make at least 3 teams (with reserves) out of those teams and one or more of those teams could find another venue. Or this way could work :P :D
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Apr 5, 2012 16:04:17 GMT
Sorry Phil still can't quite get my head round how there can be more teams. Look at the masons A and B, They can get 5 players for a game so are you saying they should lose two players each? where they gonna play if your rule comes in? Also same with the Glads A and B. If anything your gonna lose players If both teams loos 2 players you can have a masons C and with more teams your can have a couple extra leagues so you can try fix the fixtures in a way that teams wont clash i know it will be hard but it surly can be done
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Apr 5, 2012 4:49:30 GMT
I would like to second mr mace i think it is a bit stop/start and from my point of view consistency is the way forward also i have a suggestion regarding the loominpossibility of teams folding and players losing interest. What about changing the format to summer league rules to potentially create more teams and getting any young players picking up a cue for the first time to get some more game time. Thus we get more interest from young players because they can play each other rather than get stuffed by an established player ubder the current league and match format. Let me know if you all think this is a shocking idea and not worth even thinking about folks :-) i think this has been spoken about before and personally i think its a good idea it will create more teams and allow more games over a season
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Apr 4, 2012 19:04:59 GMT
I must say i have never done this and i'm a pretty relaxed guy but i would like the format of the league looked at and i'm sure some others will as well i think that its too on and off 2 or 3 weeks of games then a week or 2 of competitions it would be better if there where more games in a row then a big chunk of competitions.
|
|