|
|
Post by peetee on Apr 6, 2012 8:52:09 GMT
proposal 2 there are teams in the lower sections that we dont get to play in the season. it would be nice to play these teams to . so make the season so we play everyone.the top teams could lose the breaks to the lower teams to give them a better chance home and away.that way you play more often as there will be more teams to play.it would also be nice to see these players more than just finals night.[/quote Proposed by Ian Moss Seconded by Lewis Stratford. 2nd official proposal. |
|
|
|
Post by peetee on Apr 6, 2012 8:58:03 GMT
proposal 1 some players can only play on a thursday so is it time to state which comps will be on a play by date allowing players to choose which comps they enter. Need a seconder to discuss this further at the AGM.. |
|
|
|
Post by peetee on Apr 6, 2012 9:00:04 GMT
I would like to propose that the Association withdraw the Premier and Sect 1 Individuals next season.
|
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Apr 6, 2012 9:43:34 GMT
I would like to propose that the Association withdraw the Premier and Sect 1 Individuals next season. I will second this |
|
|
|
Post by BigPhilMac on Apr 6, 2012 11:37:58 GMT
Id like to propose a relegation/promotion system for the leagues. I understand that the same teams may not enter next year but i think its worth looking at.
|
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Apr 6, 2012 11:40:37 GMT
Id like to propose a relegation/promotion system for the leagues. I understand that the same teams may not enter next year but i think its worth looking at. Do you mean no matter who wins the league and who looses you go up or down no matter the strength of the team? if not then we already have this system lol |
|
|
|
Post by BigPhilMac on Apr 6, 2012 13:08:47 GMT
Id like to propose a relegation/promotion system for the leagues. I understand that the same teams may not enter next year but i think its worth looking at. Do you mean no matter who wins the league and who looses you go up or down no matter the strength of the team? if not then we already have this system lol i do mean that indeed :-) simple case of getting promotion from winning the league and relegation for coming bottom lol |
|
beefy
Distinguished Member
T
Posts: 753
|
Post by beefy on Apr 18, 2012 11:51:17 GMT
Do you mean no matter who wins the league and who looses you go up or down no matter the strength of the team? if not then we already have this system lol i do mean that indeed :-) simple case of getting promotion from winning the league and relegation for coming bottom lol I second tht if a team wins they should go up and likewise for finishing bottom. |
|
beefy
Distinguished Member
T
Posts: 753
|
Post by beefy on Apr 18, 2012 11:52:29 GMT
proposal 1 some players can only play on a thursday so is it time to state which comps will be on a play by date allowing players to choose which comps they enter. Need a seconder to discuss this further at the AGM.. I second that - its only fair people know what they are commiting to in advance and hopefully will stop walkover matches becuase people cant make it to a fixture. |
|
|
|
Post by peetee on Apr 22, 2012 8:42:27 GMT
Proposed by Dave Gordon
Seconded by Keith Hollis
To withdraw the Bill Moore Cup from competitions.
|
|
|
|
Post by peetee on Apr 22, 2012 8:47:29 GMT
Proposed by Dave Gordon The Scotland Ash Cup/Plate semi final to be played as the same way as earlier rounds.i,e. Drawn Home or Away and not on neutral tables.
Seconder required..
|
|
|
|
Post by alan on Apr 22, 2012 11:19:11 GMT
Proposed by Dave Gordon The Scotland Ash Cup/Plate semi final to be played as the same way as earlier rounds.i,e. Drawn Home or Away and not on neutral tables. Seconder required.. This is the only competition where the earlier rounds give advantage to the home teams. Surely at the Semi-final stage it's fairer to play on neutral tables? I propose we leave it as it is. What about changing the KO Cup to be played the same way as the Scotland Ash? This would free up some Thursdays for competitions. |
|
Was
member
(130)
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2012 12:48:09 GMT
before any changes can be made to the scot ash, the sponcer i.e pete welch must be consulted as he may not wish to change the format, if in doing so he may well stop his sponcership
|
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Apr 22, 2012 17:31:02 GMT
Proposed by Dave Gordon The Scotland Ash Cup/Plate semi final to be played as the same way as earlier rounds.i,e. Drawn Home or Away and not on neutral tables. Seconder required.. This is the only competition where the earlier rounds give advantage to the home teams. Surely at the Semi-final stage it's fairer to play on neutral tables? I propose we leave it as it is. What about changing the KO Cup to be played the same way as the Scotland Ash? This would free up some Thursdays for competitions. a I agree with Alan the quarter and semi finals of any competition should be neutral tables to give a fair game all round |
|
|
|
Post by milhouse on Apr 23, 2012 8:57:46 GMT
Proposed by Dave Gordon The Scotland Ash Cup/Plate semi final to be played as the same way as earlier rounds.i,e. Drawn Home or Away and not on neutral tables. Seconder required.. This is the only competition where the earlier rounds give advantage to the home teams. Surely at the Semi-final stage it's fairer to play on neutral tables? I propose we leave it as it is. What about changing the KO Cup to be played the same way as the Scotland Ash? This would free up some Thursdays for competitions. I think the SAC should be played on neutral tables all the way through. Also, i don't know what others think, but i don't see a need for 2 team cup competitions. If we got rid of the Team KO, this would free up 5/6 weeks in order to play more competitions on a Thursday. |
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Apr 23, 2012 16:28:02 GMT
This is the only competition where the earlier rounds give advantage to the home teams. Surely at the Semi-final stage it's fairer to play on neutral tables? I propose we leave it as it is. What about changing the KO Cup to be played the same way as the Scotland Ash? This would free up some Thursdays for competitions. I think the SAC should be played on neutral tables all the way through. Also, i don't know what others think, but i don't see a need for 2 team cup competitions. If we got rid of the Team KO, this would free up 5/6 weeks in order to play more competitions on a Thursday. I will second this if its a proposal by mark |
|
|
|
Post by milko on Apr 24, 2012 10:00:54 GMT
Looking at the proposals so far, it looks as if people want less competitions in the Oxford League to play in! If they all get accepted we would lose the Section Ind's, Bill Moore, & KO Cups. I agree with the first two but would be sad to see the KO Cup go because that has been going since the league first started in 1940/1?
Dave (gillian) makes a good point about the SAC, as, Pete W should be asked about any changes to this competition because he is the founder and sponsor of this and I think the idea behind this comp was to give the lower div team a chance to knock a bigger team out if they were drawn at home. This is why I like the idea of NO neutral tables until the final, if there is such a thing as a "neutral table"!!
Keith
|
|
Was
member
(194)
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 24, 2012 12:10:18 GMT
What's wrong with the bill moore?
|
|
Was
member
(194)
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 24, 2012 21:53:43 GMT
i suppose we have to be at the AGM if we propose or second something?
|
|
|
|
Post by peetee on Apr 26, 2012 18:46:54 GMT
i suppose we have to be at the AGM if we propose or second something? Correct Lewis..please note everyone. Pete |
|
beefy
Distinguished Member
T
Posts: 753
|
Post by beefy on Apr 27, 2012 11:52:32 GMT
So when is it then ?
|
|
|
|
Post by peetee on Apr 28, 2012 9:00:03 GMT
THURSDAY 7th June 2012 @ Gladiators Club. Pete |
|
mossy
Full Forum Member
Posts: 142
|
Post by mossy on Apr 28, 2012 9:56:10 GMT
im afraid i will be on my honeymoon on this date and wont be able to attend.
|
|
Was
member
(194)
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2012 14:00:49 GMT
I'll propose mossys first proposal then. Need a seconder
|
|
|
|
Post by peetee on May 1, 2012 15:01:06 GMT
I will tidy up the proposals shortly.
Pete
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris_Sav on May 4, 2012 11:26:22 GMT
I have removed a post replying to what I can only assume was a late night joke gone wrong that has now been deleted by the original poster.
Sav
|
|
|
|
Post by peetee on May 9, 2012 13:06:24 GMT
Proposed by Alan Lowe Seconded by Dave Tooke
All competitions that are played next season must have entries of 8 players with 6 players in the Ladies Ind
Proposed Alan Lowe Seconded Dave Tooke
Any competitions with less than the above could still run if a sponsor was found to cover the cost of trophies.
|
|
|
|
Post by milhouse on May 9, 2012 13:55:06 GMT
Proposed by Alan Lowe Seconded by Dave Tooke All competitions that are played next season must have entries of 8 players with 6 players in the Ladies Ind Proposed Alan Lowe Seconded Dave Tooke Any competitions with less than the above could still run if a sponsor was found to cover the cost of trophies. Were there any competitions this year which ran and had less entries than the criteria above ? |
|
|
|
Post by BigPhilMac on May 19, 2012 20:38:10 GMT
I have decided to clear the air about a particular incident including myself and mr mace, we all know what that is. Ive spoken to both alan and dave tonight and they are rather upset about the issue and have apologised for causing such offence. Hopefully they will see fit to accept my apology and i trust i havent created any hard feelings particularly as im new to the game as we know. Hopefully this will clear the air and improve the situation.
|
|
|
|
Post by peetee on May 22, 2012 15:00:41 GMT
Proposed PE Seconded RG
Late signings do not qualify for the highest away break and away score.
|
|
