|
Post by bigtj on Oct 13, 2012 7:23:56 GMT
Charles Dickens 1 v 4 Swan B Cellar Bar B 1 v 4 Duke of Wellington Atlas A 5 v 0 Tarring Club Swan A 4 v 1 Cellar Bar A White Hart A 3 v 2 Smugglers
Henty 2 v 3 Marine View B Romans 1 v 4 White Hart B Marine View A v Bye
|
|
|
Post by BB Warrior on Oct 25, 2012 22:09:55 GMT
Cellar Bar B 1 Duke of Wellington 4
Bill Kerr 1,480 - 13,300* Dave Ingram Rick Cunningham 14,080* - 300 Mal Spier Nikki Oakley 1,420 - 10,750* Henry Brooks Steve Aylmore 3,780* - 8,680 Chris Tupper Tony Jenner BP - 12,110* Nigel Senior
Excellent evening in good company, lovely large platters of sandwiches and wedges.... 8-)
|
|
|
Post by BB Warrior on Oct 25, 2012 22:24:18 GMT
Swan A 4 Cellar Bar A 1
|
|
dipper
Distinguished Member
Posts: 829
|
Post by dipper on Oct 26, 2012 16:25:30 GMT
Charles Dickens 1 v 4 Swan `B`.
Lyn Higgins 0,410 v 10,120 Brian Richards. Graham Lewis 9,610 v 1,800 Matthew Squire. Tony Burgess 2,550 v 10,630 Roger Taylor. Gary Ridley 6,680 v 7,800 Doug Mahy. Neil Higgins 4,020 v 8,190 Barry Holt.
Great evening with chilli and rice. I think a record break could be made on this brilliant table, with nearly a 20 minute clock.
|
|
barneybear
Full Forum Member
Paul Barnett
Posts: 296
|
Post by barneybear on Oct 27, 2012 13:06:59 GMT
Charles Dickens 1 v 4 Swan `B`. Lyn Higgins 0,410 v 10,120 Brian Richards. Graham Lewis 9,610 v 1,800 Matthew Squire. Tony Burgess 2,550 v 10,630 Roger Taylor. Gary Ridley 6,680 v 7,800 Doug Mahy. Neil Higgins 4,020 v 8,190 Barry Holt. Great evening with chilli and rice. I think a record break could be made on this brilliant table, with nearly a 20 minute clock. Yeh. We should have brought the olde house table with us. Nice to hear that the scoff was different to the first home game (which was Chinese ish and very good).trouble is I'm missing the next home game as well. I hate Chelsea.
|
|
|
Post by davejones on Oct 27, 2012 20:41:24 GMT
White Hart A Smugglers K Tunstall 12340 1930 P Brown M Cole 10020 1820 C Lucas A Messer 4280 7110 C Green S Mepham 3690 5800 M Knight S Beach 6180 1260 D Jones 3 2 Total Score 27510 17920 Average per man 5502 3584
|
|
|
Post by "Silent" on Oct 27, 2012 22:48:09 GMT
I think Martin scored a few more than that - about 10k more!
|
|
enzo
Distinguished Member
Posts: 637
|
Post by enzo on Oct 30, 2012 9:50:45 GMT
Unofficial table at the moment: Premier DivisionPos | Team | Played | Won | Lost | For | Against | Points | Diff | 1 | Duke of Wellington | 4 | 4 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 8 | 10 | 2 | White Hart A | 4 | 4 | 0 | 13 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 3 | Swan B | 4 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 4 | Charles Dickens | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 12 | 2 | -4 | 5 | Atlas A | 4 | 3 | 1 | 16 | 4 | 6 | 12 |
1st DivisionPos | Team | Played | Won | Lost | For | Against | Points | Diff | 1 | Smugglers Return | 4 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Tarring Club | 4 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 15 | 2 | -10 | 3 | Cellar Bar B | 4 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 13 | 4 | -6 | 4 | Swan A | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 12 | 2 | -4 | 5 | Cellar Bar A | 4 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 14 | 0 | -8 |
|
|
|
Post by BB Warrior on Oct 30, 2012 10:39:09 GMT
Unofficial table at the moment: Premier DivisionPos | Team | Played | Won | Lost | For | Against | Points | Diff | 1 | Duke of Wellington | 4 | 4 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 8 | 10 | 2 | White Hart A | 4 | 4 | 0 | 13 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 3 | Swan B | 4 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 4 | Charles Dickens | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 12 | 2 | -4 | 5 | Atlas A | 4 | 3 | 1 | 16 | 4 | 6 | 12 |
1st DivisionPos | Team | Played | Won | Lost | For | Against | Points | Diff | 1 | Smugglers Return | 4 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Tarring Club | 4 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 15 | 2 | -10 | 3 | Cellar Bar B | 4 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 13 | 4 | -6 | 4 | Swan A | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 12 | 2 | -4 | 5 | Cellar Bar A | 4 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 14 | 0 | -8 |
Hmmmm.... yes, very unofficial!! ::) Looking at the above, I think that Atlas A should be third in Premier rather than bottom.... :o And, in Division 1, it looks as if Cellar Bar B should be second, Swan A third and Tarring Club fourth..... ;D A nice format used to display the tables though..... 8-)
|
|
|
Post by davejones on Oct 31, 2012 20:24:14 GMT
Unofficial table at the moment: Premier DivisionPos | Team | Played | Won | Lost | For | Against | Points | Diff | 1 | Duke of Wellington | 4 | 4 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 8 | 10 | 2 | White Hart A | 4 | 4 | 0 | 13 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 3 | Swan B | 4 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 4 | Charles Dickens | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 12 | 2 | -4 | 5 | Atlas A | 4 | 3 | 1 | 16 | 4 | 6 | 12 |
1st DivisionPos | Team | Played | Won | Lost | For | Against | Points | Diff | 1 | Smugglers Return | 4 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Tarring Club | 4 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 15 | 2 | -10 | 3 | Cellar Bar B | 4 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 13 | 4 | -6 | 4 | Swan A | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 12 | 2 | -4 | 5 | Cellar Bar A | 4 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 14 | 0 | -8 |
Hmmmm.... yes, very unofficial!! ::) Looking at the above, I think that Atlas A should be third in Premier rather than bottom.... :o And, in Division 1, it looks as if Cellar Bar B should be second, Swan A third and Tarring Club fourth..... ;D A nice format used to display the tables though..... 8-) There is no need for the difference column. We do not use it! The rules are as follows:– 2 points will be awarded for a win and 1 point for a draw. League positions will be determined by points won. If more than one team has the same number of points, teams will be positioned according to number of games won.
|
|
|
Post by davejones on Oct 31, 2012 20:25:17 GMT
Romans 1 White Hart B 4 Henty 2 Marine View B 3
|
|
enzo
Distinguished Member
Posts: 637
|
Post by enzo on Nov 3, 2012 12:07:37 GMT
Hmmmm.... yes, very unofficial!! ::) Looking at the above, I think that Atlas A should be third in Premier rather than bottom.... :o And, in Division 1, it looks as if Cellar Bar B should be second, Swan A third and Tarring Club fourth..... ;D A nice format used to display the tables though..... 8-) There is no need for the difference column. We do not use it! The rules are as follows:– 2 points will be awarded for a win and 1 point for a draw. League positions will be determined by points won. If more than one team has the same number of points, teams will be positioned according to number of games won. Dave I - I realised this after adding this week's scores in, my sort criteria didn't seem to work properly before I put the table up and didn't proof it ::) Dave J - Yes I am aware of the ruling, but I had it there from the Brighton & Littlehampton leagues and is effectively the same thing, as the 'games lost' directly correlates to 'games won' and is just a different visual representation of this.
|
|