StuC
Distinguished Member
Posts: 754
|
Post by StuC on Oct 3, 2023 20:26:19 GMT
|
|
StuC
Distinguished Member
Posts: 754
|
Post by StuC on Dec 28, 2023 22:00:48 GMT
|
|
StuC
Distinguished Member
Posts: 754
|
Post by StuC on Feb 19, 2024 21:16:55 GMT
Sussex Rankings have been updated on website to include Sussex Competitions weekend and Inter League Series six and seven.
|
|
StuC
Distinguished Member
Posts: 754
|
Post by StuC on Apr 29, 2024 12:51:46 GMT
|
|
|
Post by tommo III on Apr 29, 2024 14:09:45 GMT
Brilliant work as usual, and done very promptly, but I can't see any mention of Dewdneys on the Sussex ranking list ..... Dick earned 18.5 and Ricky 19.6 in the One-Day Interleagues, representing Billingshurst.
Not enough maybe for Masters qualification, but still deserve to feature.
|
|
StuC
Distinguished Member
Posts: 754
|
Post by StuC on Apr 29, 2024 14:53:13 GMT
Brilliant work as usual, and done very promptly, but I can't see any mention of Dewdneys on the Sussex ranking list ..... Dick earned 18.5 and Ricky 19.6 in the One-Day Interleagues, representing Billingshurst. Not enough maybe for Masters qualification, but still deserve to feature. Good question. I now have them listed as Surrey players in the system, and therefore they are not eligible for ranking points and been removed the the list under Sussex Rule 19 (with Ricky in the semi-finals to potentially represent Surrey in AEBBA Individuals). I have asked the question as to which county they would like to be considered as and will update accordingly.
|
|
|
Post by bobhall on Apr 29, 2024 15:09:52 GMT
Interleague rankings havient been added yet as they are still the same from last series
|
|
|
Post by milhouse on Apr 29, 2024 15:20:53 GMT
Brilliant work as usual, and done very promptly, but I can't see any mention of Dewdneys on the Sussex ranking list ..... Dick earned 18.5 and Ricky 19.6 in the One-Day Interleagues, representing Billingshurst. Not enough maybe for Masters qualification, but still deserve to feature. Good question. I now have them listed as Surrey players in the system, and therefore they are not eligible for ranking points and been removed the the list under Sussex Rule 19 (with Ricky in the semi-finals to potentially represent Surrey in AEBBA Individuals). I have asked the question as to which county they would like to be considered as and will update accordingly. If someone is going through qualifying for a county individuals, then i am pretty sure they are tied to that county for this year. I'm sure Nigel will be able to confirm?
|
|
|
Post by "Silent" on Apr 29, 2024 15:34:55 GMT
Interleague rankings having been added yet as they are still the same from last series Are you sure Bob, they look updated to me?
|
|
|
Post by billiardsmichael on Apr 29, 2024 15:41:45 GMT
Good question. I now have them listed as Surrey players in the system, and therefore they are not eligible for ranking points and been removed the the list under Sussex Rule 19 (with Ricky in the semi-finals to potentially represent Surrey in AEBBA Individuals). I have asked the question as to which county they would like to be considered as and will update accordingly. If someone is going through qualifying for a county individuals, then i am pretty sure they are tied to that county for this year. I'm sure Nigel will be able to confirm? Please note that the following is my interpretation of the rules (i.e. I am NOT speaking on behalf of the RDBBL committee) and I would be happy to be corrected by the RDBBL committee if this interpretation is incorrect:Ricky is playing in the Redhill League singles. This is a league event, NOT a county event. However as per the RDBBL rules, "Singles and Pairs Competitions" Rule 13: So the winner will have the chance to represent Surrey, although they do not have to (e.g. if they are affiliated to another county they may not be able to represent Surrey).
|
|
|
Post by bobhall on Apr 29, 2024 16:36:12 GMT
Interleague rankings having been added yet as they are still the same from last series Are you sure Bob, they look updated to me? Yes I have 27.3 but showing as 22 stu Mepham has 40 or more but his is showing less
|
|
|
Post by JB on Apr 29, 2024 17:01:13 GMT
Hi Rob
It’s showing as 27.3 on all the ones I’m looking at
|
|
|
Post by tommo III on Apr 29, 2024 17:44:40 GMT
Quoting billiardsmichael: Yes, most of us "Redhill N/As" are well aware of the Sussex Rule applicable to closed competitions. Rick'n'Dick are new to the scene (as is BB Warrior) but - for this year anyway - have chosen to represent a Sussex League in the Interleague competition(s) and not Redhill. It may well be that Ricky gets an invite to represent Surrey and then the choice would be his and if he took it up he would become an N/A. Ricky and Dick are both aware of the ramifications and I am sure they will not be violating the Sussex rule on this.
|
|
StuC
Distinguished Member
Posts: 754
|
Post by StuC on Apr 29, 2024 18:57:13 GMT
Brilliant work as usual, and done very promptly, but I can't see any mention of Dewdneys on the Sussex ranking list ..... Dick earned 18.5 and Ricky 19.6 in the One-Day Interleagues, representing Billingshurst. Not enough maybe for Masters qualification, but still deserve to feature. Good question. I now have them listed as Surrey players in the system, and therefore they are not eligible for ranking points and been removed the the list under Sussex Rule 19 (with Ricky in the semi-finals to potentially represent Surrey in AEBBA Individuals). I have asked the question as to which county they would like to be considered as and will update accordingly. Been confirmed that Surrey is correct, so rankings remained unchanged
|
|
StuC
Distinguished Member
Posts: 754
|
Post by StuC on Apr 29, 2024 18:59:11 GMT
Are you sure Bob, they look updated to me? Yes I have 27.3 but showing as 22 stu Mepham has 40 or more but his is showing less Can confirm they have been fully updated to include last night. Heard about this before where cookies mean that an older version of the page gets loaded when using links on proboards. Try refreshing the page and hopefully get the correct updated version. Thanks
|
|
|
Post by bobhall on Apr 29, 2024 19:19:31 GMT
Yes I have 27.3 but showing as 22 stu Mepham has 40 or more but his is showing less Can confirm they have been fully updated to include last night. Heard about this before where cookies mean that an older version of the page gets loaded when using links on proboards. Try refreshing the page and hopefully get the correct updated version. Thanks Cheers Stuart that worked a treat have a fun time away and see you in guernsey
|
|