|
|
Post by BB Warrior on Jan 31, 2009 9:37:21 GMT
Table averages at the half-way stage of the season (after week 15)....
Pos Team Home Average Average Match Score
Matches Home Away Average
1 Laughing Fish 7 4028 3020 7048
2 Greyhound 7 4028 2629 6657
3 Hurst A 8 4199 2279 6478
4 Hurst B 7 3506 2709 6215
5 Watermill A 7 3394 2512 5906
6 Brewers Droops 8 3642 2177 5819
7 Eight Bells 1 2142 3526 5668
8 CKRBL 7 2944 2512 5456
9 White Horse 8 2144 3204 5348
10 Handcross Z 7 3261 2034 5295
11 United Services 8 2203 3078 5281
12 Brewers Bravos 7 2453 2558 5011
13 Sportsman 7 3086 1734 4820
14 Watermill B 8 1736 2916 4652
15 St Francis 8 2547 1788 4335
16 Plough 7 2456 1833 4289
17 Royal Oak 7 1197 2609 3806
N/A Brewers Royals 0 0 0 0
|
|
|
|
Post by BB Warrior on Feb 3, 2009 7:16:25 GMT
A couple of changes after week 16 matches.....
Hurst A jump above Greyhound into 2nd place, mainly thanks to H's big hit, USC climb 3 places after some good scores by both teams and Brewers Royals move into 14th place after their first game at the new home. ;)
No game scores reported from St Francis v Greyhound. :(
Pos Team Home Average Average Average
Matches Home Away Match Score
1 Laughing Fish 7 4028 3020 7048
2 Hurst A 9 4087 2688 6775
3 Greyhound 7 4028 2629 6657
4 Hurst B 7 3506 2709 6215
5 Watermill A 7 3394 2512 5906
6 Brewers Droops 8 3642 2177 5819
7 Eight Bells 2 2537 3244 5781
8 United Services Club 9 2168 3369 5537
9 CKRBL 7 2944 2512 5456
10 White Horse 9 2202 3148 5350
11 Handcross Z 7 3261 2034 5295
12 Brewers Bravos 8 2479 2783 5262
13 Sportsman 7 3086 1734 4820
14 Brewers Royals 1 808 3892 4700
15 Watermill B 9 1631 2916 4547
16 St Francis 8 2547 1788 4335
17 Plough 7 2456 1833 4289
18 Royal Oak 7 1197 2609 3806
YELLOW = Average has improved since last list
RED = Average has reduced since previous list
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2009 10:55:42 GMT
I've had a look at this, because I do like statistics, but as is often the case, you can't always draw definite conclusions from them.
Apples and pears and all that.
One thing that has suddenly become apparent to me is that a table can't necessarily be derided for having a lower-than-usual Away player average on it. Take some of the one-sided matches there have been down in Brighton, for instance: The Stadium could by no stretch of the imagination be branded a bad table because none of the five away players could muster a thousand points - if the home players' aggregate was 90k ! :o ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by BB Warrior on Feb 3, 2009 11:18:05 GMT
I've had a look at this, because I do like statistics, but as is often the case, you can't always draw definite conclusions from them. Apples and pears and all that. One thing that has suddenly become apparent to me is that a table can't necessarily be derided for having a lower-than-usual Away player average on it. Take some of the one-sided matches there have been down in Brighton, for instance: The Stadium could by no stretch of the imagination be branded a bad table because none of the five away players could muster a thousand points - if the home players' aggregate was 90k ! :o ;D ;D ;D Absolutely correct Tommo, the only thing that you can tell from these figures are possible trends..... and where the strongest & weakest teams / players play. ;) Looking at the figures for Ros's table..... when it was at the Sportsman it had the lowest away team average in the League, now it has been moved to the Eight Bells the away team average is among the highest - although the home team average has dropped. :'( But is that because the home team form has dropped...... perhaps the table is now set up differently...... or is it simply because the 2 matches played there so far have been against the "in-form" defending champions...... and H's team of course??!! ::) ;D ;D ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2009 12:21:21 GMT
It's certainly interesting to glance down the For and Away columns:
You can more or less predict what your chances of going to the venue and winning might be.
If you roughly take a 3000 home average to 2000 away average representing 3:2, most seem to favour 3-2 to the home team (with a few notable exceptions).
|
|
|
|
Post by BB Warrior on Feb 3, 2009 12:37:38 GMT
It's certainly interesting to glance down the For and Away columns: You can more or less predict what your chances of going to the venue and winning might be. If you roughly take a 3000 home average to 2000 away average representing 3:2, most seem to favour 3-2 to the home team (with a few notable exceptions). Yes, you could certainly use it as a "guide" as to how well previous teams have done at a venue and how the home team are performing. Obviously, the only way you could really judge the odds would be to compare the figures to the average score each team achieve when they play away from home...... ;) |
|
