|
|
Post by peetee on May 12, 2015 17:54:50 GMT
I will except any proposals that you might have on this AGM thread.
Please note that any proposals posted on here will be discussed and dealt with at the AGM.
Please keep proposals tidy....
A The Proposal..
B Proposed by
C Seconded by..
Thanks
Pete
|
|
beefy
Distinguished Member
T
Posts: 753
|
Post by beefy on May 13, 2015 8:54:38 GMT
Four player rule amendment.
Any team using the 4 player rule must forfeit a break. currently the rule says its the 4th or 5th game that is adjusted accordingly.
This works fine for most scenario's with one exception when playing teams in the bottom section.
As it stands
Prem against bottom no breaks anyway - so the four player rule doesn't really apply here
Section 1 against bottom is where the issue is, if the section one team is away its fine but there is a problem when they are at home. Currently they get the first break only. This means they are not penalised for playing the four player rule at home.
I propose they SHOULD lose the first break as well if the 4 player rule is used.
|
|
|
|
Post by milhouse on May 13, 2015 9:48:35 GMT
Four player rule amendment. Any team using the 4 player rule must forfeit a break. currently the rule says its the 4th or 5th game that is adjusted accordingly. This works fine for most scenario's with one exception when playing teams in the bottom section. As it stands Prem against bottom no breaks anyway - so the four player rule doesn't really apply here Section 1 against bottom is where the issue is, if the section one team is away its fine but there is a problem when they are at home. Currently they get the first break only. This means they are not penalised for playing the four player rule at home. I propose they SHOULD lose the first break as well if the 4 player rule is used. I think this is the first sensible post i have ever seen you put on here! I will second this as an amendment to the 4-player rule (Obviously this game will need to then be moved to be played last) |
|
|
|
Post by milhouse on May 13, 2015 9:51:01 GMT
There have been a lot of talk this season from various players with regards to league games v competitions. Some saying there are too many comp dates and not enough league games and some complaining about comp games being cancelled etc.
So, maybe ALL competitions (Not Team cup games) should be on played by dates so we can have a lot more league games ?
|
|
|
|
Post by BigPhilMac on May 13, 2015 11:32:39 GMT
There have been a lot of talk this season from various players with regards to league games v competitions. Some saying there are too many comp dates and not enough league games and some complaining about comp games being cancelled etc. So, maybe ALL competitions (Not Team cup games) should be on played by dates so we can have a lot more league games ? I'll second this one |
|
beefy
Distinguished Member
T
Posts: 753
|
Post by beefy on May 14, 2015 10:28:19 GMT
I think the 3's should stay on a Thursday but other than that I agree. if you get knocked out or don't enter there are too many gaps.
|
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on May 15, 2015 4:26:36 GMT
There have been a lot of talk this season from various players with regards to league games v competitions. Some saying there are too many comp dates and not enough league games and some complaining about comp games being cancelled etc. So, maybe ALL competitions (Not Team cup games) should be on played by dates so we can have a lot more league games ? Can't see this working not many people will play comps on play by dates especially from the first round probably find a savage drop in numbers |
|
|
|
Post by milhouse on May 18, 2015 9:10:03 GMT
There have been a lot of talk this season from various players with regards to league games v competitions. Some saying there are too many comp dates and not enough league games and some complaining about comp games being cancelled etc. So, maybe ALL competitions (Not Team cup games) should be on played by dates so we can have a lot more league games ? Can't see this working not many people will play comps on play by dates especially from the first round probably find a savage drop in numbers That is your opinion, like i said in my proposal, a few people would prefer this way, so it's up to the AGM to decide. |
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on May 18, 2015 10:44:21 GMT
Can't see this working not many people will play comps on play by dates especially from the first round probably find a savage drop in numbers That is your opinion, like i said in my proposal, a few people would prefer this way, so it's up to the AGM to decide. Just giving my opinion seeing as I won't be at the agm due to being at download festival |
|
rag
Full Forum Member
Posts: 143 
|
Post by rag on May 21, 2015 8:43:15 GMT
All competitions the player who's name is first on the draw sheet is responsible for making contact failure to do so will result in the other person going through
Proposed Richard Garrett seconded Dave Gordon
|
|
rag
Full Forum Member
Posts: 143
|
Post by rag on May 21, 2015 8:45:57 GMT
If a player holds the highest break in a competition and fails to turn up to play in later rounds he forfeits the highest break as he has denied the person he was due to play the opportunity to try and beat it.Proposed Richard Garrett Seconded Alan Lowe
|
|
rag
Full Forum Member
Posts: 143
|
Post by rag on May 21, 2015 9:33:04 GMT
Players turning up late
Any player/s turning up late must be at the venue by 9.30pm. If the player/s is/are not at the venue by 9.30pm a reserve must be used or the 4 player rule instigated.Proposed Richard Garrett Seconded Alan Oliver
|
|
rag
Full Forum Member
Posts: 143
|
Post by rag on May 21, 2015 9:34:20 GMT
Games being brought forward
Any games being played more than a month in advance must obtain the committees full approval in advance failure to do so will result in the score not standing and the game replayed. Proposed Richard Garrett Seconded Alan Oliver
|
|
rag
Full Forum Member
Posts: 143
|
Post by rag on May 21, 2015 9:35:25 GMT
Captains responsibility
When a team captain is sent details of games to be played on their home table whether their team is involved or not it is their responsibility to let their home venue know. Proposed Richard Garrett Seconded Alan Oliver
|
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on May 21, 2015 15:17:18 GMT
All competitions the player who's name is first on the draw sheet is responsible for making contact failure to do so will result in the other person going through Proposed Richard Garrett seconded Dave Gordon Hope u don't mind rich gunna poke me nose in due to not being at agm this ruling would be ok if comp sheets get sent out over the last season I got 1 comp sheet and the rest was on the forum so most of the time people don't know who is first out also with all respect it should be down to both players to contact not just 1 |
|
|
|
Post by peetee on Jun 1, 2015 16:21:24 GMT
Thurs matches to be changed to 4 singles and 2 pairs
Players in the pairs can be substituted 1 in each pair.
This will do away with the four player rule
Proposed Dave Gordon
Seconded Sid Ponting
|
|
|
|
Post by peetee on Jun 8, 2015 18:33:05 GMT
Hi Everyone
Just a reminder it's AGM night this THURSDAY 11th June
Please make every effort to attend as there are proposals to discuss.
See You Thurs
Pete
|
|
|
|
Post by BigPhilMac on Jun 11, 2015 9:38:18 GMT
Hi all, what time is the meeting starting tonight?
|
|
|
|
Post by alan on Jun 11, 2015 12:04:27 GMT
Hi all, what time is the meeting starting tonight? It will start at 8pm Phil. |
|
beefy
Distinguished Member
T
Posts: 753
|
Post by beefy on Jun 11, 2015 16:16:56 GMT
Alan I am rowing but will try to get there for the start, no boats to take apart this year. I should be off the water by 730pm so should be fine see you later.
|
|
|
|
Post by peetee on Jun 12, 2015 11:55:48 GMT
Thurs matches to be changed to 4 singles and 2 pairs Players in the pairs can be substituted 1 in each pair. This will do away with the four player rule Proposed Dave Gordon Seconded Sid Ponting CARRIED. I was a little surprised that this proposal was carried. I personally didn't vote for this proposal. |
|
|
|
Post by peetee on Jun 18, 2015 12:38:02 GMT
A total of 20 turned up at the AGM.
Vikings 2 members
HCC 4 members
Democrats 4 members
Glad's A 3 members
Glad's B....None
Berinsfield 1 member
Marlborough...None
Masons 4 Members
Didcot CC 1 Member
Kennington 1 Member
Thanks.
|
|
mossy
Full Forum Member
Posts: 142
|
Post by mossy on Jun 18, 2015 15:45:22 GMT
how will you be doing most wins this season,or will you be dropping it.As teams may have to rotate there teams so every one gets to play through the season.will there be a pairs trophy as well. just a thought.
|
|
|
|
Post by milhouse on Jun 18, 2015 17:19:48 GMT
how will you be doing most wins this season,or will you be dropping it.As teams may have to rotate there teams so every one gets to play through the season.will there be a pairs trophy as well. just a thought. Most wins will only count in the Singles Matches |
|
mossy
Full Forum Member
Posts: 142
|
Post by mossy on Jun 18, 2015 19:43:40 GMT
but most teams have 5 players so will have to rotate to give everyone a chance to play.it would be unfair to lose out on most wins as you have to rotate to accommodate this change. will we be going back to equal breaks against the lower division teams as they will be given the break twice in the game as rules stand.
|
|
|
|
Post by milhouse on Jun 18, 2015 23:54:37 GMT
but most teams have 5 players so will have to rotate to give everyone a chance to play.it would be unfair to lose out on most wins as you have to rotate to accommodate this change. will we be going back to equal breaks against the lower division teams as they will be given the break twice in the game as rules stand. Breaks etc are being worked out as we speak and an EGM will be called to actually adopt the playing rules under this new format. With all the negativity i have heard since this was passed at the AGM i wouldn't be surprised if a proposal to go back to 5-a-side will be put forward at the EGM to be voted on. |
|
sandra
Full Forum Member
Posts: 65
|
Post by sandra on Jun 19, 2015 8:40:46 GMT
I'm not in favour of the new format either, and I voted against it at the AGM. However, the proposal was on the forum for quite a while before the meeting, so most people would have been aware of the proposal. If they had strong views either way they should have turned up at the meeting to vote. If people don't turn up to vote, they shouldn't moan about it afterwards.
|
|
mossy
Full Forum Member
Posts: 142
|
Post by mossy on Jun 19, 2015 15:04:25 GMT
it was a long way to go from ibiza.
|
|
|
|
Post by craig mace on Jun 19, 2015 15:40:30 GMT
I'm not in favour of the new format either, and I voted against it at the AGM. However, the proposal was on the forum for quite a while before the meeting, so most people would have been aware of the proposal. If they had strong views either way they should have turned up at the meeting to vote. If people don't turn up to vote, they shouldn't moan about it afterwards. I was at a festival and am strongly against the format any chance of an egm? |
|
sandra
Full Forum Member
Posts: 65
|
Post by sandra on Jun 20, 2015 13:19:03 GMT
Can we have another EGM if I can't be bothered to turn up at the first EGM and I don't agree with the decision to overturn the decision made at the AGM??
|
|
